RonPeeters
Member
Hi @bernard ,
I have spend the last week going through your code and I am really impressed on the motor control with odometry.
I do not fully grasp the inner workings of the PID controller and some of the calculations you make, but that will come eventually
I have seen that it has become a really complex state-machine, because of the old Azurit code remains and that you have created a new state for every operation/target. In my opinion this makes everything over-complex and hard to improve.
I am proposing a new/revised way of coding the Ardumower, that I want to contribute to your current code.
I would like to know your point of view on this method and would really like to accomplish this together, instead of creating my own standalone fork of your code.
I have posted my proposals as an issue on Github, to be able to discuss code with you and others there.
With kind regards,
Ron Peeters
I have spend the last week going through your code and I am really impressed on the motor control with odometry.
I do not fully grasp the inner workings of the PID controller and some of the calculations you make, but that will come eventually
I have seen that it has become a really complex state-machine, because of the old Azurit code remains and that you have created a new state for every operation/target. In my opinion this makes everything over-complex and hard to improve.
I am proposing a new/revised way of coding the Ardumower, that I want to contribute to your current code.
I would like to know your point of view on this method and would really like to accomplish this together, instead of creating my own standalone fork of your code.
I have posted my proposals as an issue on Github, to be able to discuss code with you and others there.
With kind regards,
Ron Peeters